LR CC and PS CC are both really great at most tasks, but they fall short on alignments and on panos. LR CC even screws up HDR a lot of the time even when the subject isn't moving, so no alignment necessary. I've tried both LR CC and PS CC in the past to do alignments and panos, and neither ever does a very good job. I rarely do panos, but as I recall the rule of thumb is to have at least 30% overlap. The default file size in PTGui is something like 80%, so it'll downscale the image size 80% during output.
![ptgui export side by side ptgui export side by side](https://idmcrackfile.info/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Ptgui-Pro-Crack.jpg)
For instance, if Hugin cannot output a psb file then it is limited to the psd file size restriction and thus it might downscale the stitched pano to meet that file size restriction.
Ptgui export side by side software#
It's quite common for pano stitching software to automatically reduce resolution in order to create a specific file size. Hugin might have reduced resolution/scaled down the panorama based upon some setting you have checked in that software.
![ptgui export side by side ptgui export side by side](https://ptgui.com/images/whatsnew9/dualmask.jpg)
If the same images were used (same pixel size) than the software should have spit out roughly the same dimensional panorama. Thanks for the PTGui suggestion - I'll try that now.Ĭropping would have no effect because the software still has to align overlapping regions of each frame, this is a scaling issue. I presume Hugin cropped more to make the perspective work? I did export from Lightroom (as TIFF's) and I made sure not to scale.
![ptgui export side by side ptgui export side by side](https://us.v-cdn.net/5021068/uploads/editor/b2/ubd7htutf53v.jpg)
I prefer PTGui over Hugin for it's control over masking and control point setting for the most optimal merging, lots of perspective options as well. Is it possible to have LR do a better job merging the photos without the vertical dark banding?ĭid you export the images from Lightroom so they could be stitched in Hugin? If you did is it possible you did an image scaling/resolution change upon export? That would be my guess as to what's happened.įWIW PTGui handles the vignetting issues quite well, it also has an auto white balance correction and exposure correction for frame to frame slight issues that works well. However, Hugins final resolution was less than Lightroom - and maybe I don't understand the power of multiplication, but the result went from 117MP in Lightroom (19358圆069) to 60MP in Hugin (13462x4509). I found "Hugin" and it was also able to create the pano, and it did it without the vignette. I tried adjusting the vignette on each image to make the edges overexposed, but creating a new pano with those settings. However, Lightroom created an artifact that looked like a vignette / vertical bands. I'm not sure a ballhead is the right tool for the job here, as creating each image was a bit of guesswork when moving to the next frame.Īt the end of the day, LightRoom was able to merge my 17 (that's odd) images into a pano.
![ptgui export side by side ptgui export side by side](https://www.hedged.media/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/202390-origin_1.jpg)
I used a MoveShootMove star tracker, with a Z-bracket on it to put my ballhead on. I also tried uploading the monoscopic export to youtube, to see if it was a platform/player issue, but after processing the video was still monoscopic, with no 3D option.My ham-fisted approach to creating a MW panorama didn't quite go as smoothly as I had hoped. I have tried all the scaling options and frame layouts, but never manage to get a side-by-side export. The export, however always comes out as monoscopic or distorted no matter what settings I tweak in the export window. VR Captured View: 180° Horizontal by 180° Verticalįurthermore, all the monitors (source monitor, program monitor, export monitor) shows the video as stereoscopic. When imported all the proper metadata is there: In 180 mode, the Insta360 eveo shoots side-by-side footage. I have had zero issues working with and exporting 360 videos.ġ80 videos are a different matter unfortunately. I have been shooting some test footage on an Insta360 Evo 180/360 combi cam.Īfter installing all the Insta360 plugins, as well as some from GoPro, the workflow seems to work rather well in PP.